Certainly, due to the Oilers’ third consecutive win, the sequence is now deadlocked at 3-3 heading to Recreation 7 at Amerant Financial institution Enviornment in Dawn, Florida on Monday (8 p.m. ET; ABC, ESPN+, SN, TVAS, CBC). Win that one, and Edmonton will be a part of the 1942 Toronto Maple Leafs as the one groups to return again from a 3-0 deficit within the Last and win a Stanley Cup.
And if that does occur, historical past will present that the decision by Knoblauch was a key second on the Oilers’ highway to the title.
The play in query occurred at 56 seconds of the second interval, simply 10 seconds after Oilers ahead Adam Henrique had widened Edmonton’s result in 2-0. With the gang nonetheless buzzing in regards to the Oilers’ second objective, Florida instantly responded with a line rush that resulted in a objective by Aleksander Barkov, immediately siphoning the vitality out of raucous Rogers Place and giving momentum to the Panthers with the sport now tight at 2-1.
Or so everybody thought.
Not so quick.
Knoblauch and quite a few his gamers felt the play main as much as Barkov’s objective was offside on the blue line. After conferring together with his employees, he challenged the play.
Preserve this in thoughts: had he misplaced the problem, the Oilers would have been assessed a delay of recreation penalty. Not solely would the Panthers be inside one objective, they might additionally instantly go to the ability play.
However he didn’t lose it and, as such, seemed like a genius.
Once more.
“I really didn’t suppose it was that shut,” Knoblauch mentioned of the play. “We have been going to name it immediately however we did have a little bit time to evaluate it and mentioned ‘OK.’ Possibly the one hesitation was that perhaps there wasn’t the precise angle on the video.
“In my thoughts it was positively offside. It was one thing we needed to problem nearly instantly once we noticed it.”
Panthers coach Paul Maurice wasn’t so positive.
“I do not know (in the event that they received it proper),” he mentioned. “It might effectively have been offside. The traces particular person knowledgeable me that it was the final clip that they received the place they made the choice that exhibits it’s offside. I don’t have these. So the video I received on my bench, I used to be upset after the decision primarily based on what I see at my toes, what my video particular person seems at.
“There was no method I might’ve challenged that if it was reversed, there was no method I believed you can conclusively say that was offside. I don’t know what the Oilers get, I don’t know what the league will get. I simply know that after I would’ve needed to have challenged that primarily based on what I noticed, I might not have challenged. I’m not saying it isn’t offside. We’ll get nonetheless frames, deliver within the CIA, we’ll determine it out. However within the 30 seconds that I might’ve made that decision, I might not have challenged.”
Certainly, due to the Oilers’ third consecutive win, the sequence is now deadlocked at 3-3 heading to Recreation 7 at Amerant Financial institution Enviornment in Dawn, Florida on Monday (8 p.m. ET; ABC, ESPN+, SN, TVAS, CBC). Win that one, and Edmonton will be a part of the 1942 Toronto Maple Leafs as the one groups to return again from a 3-0 deficit within the Last and win a Stanley Cup.
And if that does occur, historical past will present that the decision by Knoblauch was a key second on the Oilers’ highway to the title.
The play in query occurred at 56 seconds of the second interval, simply 10 seconds after Oilers ahead Adam Henrique had widened Edmonton’s result in 2-0. With the gang nonetheless buzzing in regards to the Oilers’ second objective, Florida instantly responded with a line rush that resulted in a objective by Aleksander Barkov, immediately siphoning the vitality out of raucous Rogers Place and giving momentum to the Panthers with the sport now tight at 2-1.
Or so everybody thought.
Not so quick.
Knoblauch and quite a few his gamers felt the play main as much as Barkov’s objective was offside on the blue line. After conferring together with his employees, he challenged the play.
Preserve this in thoughts: had he misplaced the problem, the Oilers would have been assessed a delay of recreation penalty. Not solely would the Panthers be inside one objective, they might additionally instantly go to the ability play.
However he didn’t lose it and, as such, seemed like a genius.
Once more.
“I really didn’t suppose it was that shut,” Knoblauch mentioned of the play. “We have been going to name it immediately however we did have a little bit time to evaluate it and mentioned ‘OK.’ Possibly the one hesitation was that perhaps there wasn’t the precise angle on the video.
“In my thoughts it was positively offside. It was one thing we needed to problem nearly instantly once we noticed it.”
Panthers coach Paul Maurice wasn’t so positive.
“I do not know (in the event that they received it proper),” he mentioned. “It might effectively have been offside. The traces particular person knowledgeable me that it was the final clip that they received the place they made the choice that exhibits it’s offside. I don’t have these. So the video I received on my bench, I used to be upset after the decision primarily based on what I see at my toes, what my video particular person seems at.
“There was no method I might’ve challenged that if it was reversed, there was no method I believed you can conclusively say that was offside. I don’t know what the Oilers get, I don’t know what the league will get. I simply know that after I would’ve needed to have challenged that primarily based on what I noticed, I might not have challenged. I’m not saying it isn’t offside. We’ll get nonetheless frames, deliver within the CIA, we’ll determine it out. However within the 30 seconds that I might’ve made that decision, I might not have challenged.”
Certainly, due to the Oilers’ third consecutive win, the sequence is now deadlocked at 3-3 heading to Recreation 7 at Amerant Financial institution Enviornment in Dawn, Florida on Monday (8 p.m. ET; ABC, ESPN+, SN, TVAS, CBC). Win that one, and Edmonton will be a part of the 1942 Toronto Maple Leafs as the one groups to return again from a 3-0 deficit within the Last and win a Stanley Cup.
And if that does occur, historical past will present that the decision by Knoblauch was a key second on the Oilers’ highway to the title.
The play in query occurred at 56 seconds of the second interval, simply 10 seconds after Oilers ahead Adam Henrique had widened Edmonton’s result in 2-0. With the gang nonetheless buzzing in regards to the Oilers’ second objective, Florida instantly responded with a line rush that resulted in a objective by Aleksander Barkov, immediately siphoning the vitality out of raucous Rogers Place and giving momentum to the Panthers with the sport now tight at 2-1.
Or so everybody thought.
Not so quick.
Knoblauch and quite a few his gamers felt the play main as much as Barkov’s objective was offside on the blue line. After conferring together with his employees, he challenged the play.
Preserve this in thoughts: had he misplaced the problem, the Oilers would have been assessed a delay of recreation penalty. Not solely would the Panthers be inside one objective, they might additionally instantly go to the ability play.
However he didn’t lose it and, as such, seemed like a genius.
Once more.
“I really didn’t suppose it was that shut,” Knoblauch mentioned of the play. “We have been going to name it immediately however we did have a little bit time to evaluate it and mentioned ‘OK.’ Possibly the one hesitation was that perhaps there wasn’t the precise angle on the video.
“In my thoughts it was positively offside. It was one thing we needed to problem nearly instantly once we noticed it.”
Panthers coach Paul Maurice wasn’t so positive.
“I do not know (in the event that they received it proper),” he mentioned. “It might effectively have been offside. The traces particular person knowledgeable me that it was the final clip that they received the place they made the choice that exhibits it’s offside. I don’t have these. So the video I received on my bench, I used to be upset after the decision primarily based on what I see at my toes, what my video particular person seems at.
“There was no method I might’ve challenged that if it was reversed, there was no method I believed you can conclusively say that was offside. I don’t know what the Oilers get, I don’t know what the league will get. I simply know that after I would’ve needed to have challenged that primarily based on what I noticed, I might not have challenged. I’m not saying it isn’t offside. We’ll get nonetheless frames, deliver within the CIA, we’ll determine it out. However within the 30 seconds that I might’ve made that decision, I might not have challenged.”
Certainly, due to the Oilers’ third consecutive win, the sequence is now deadlocked at 3-3 heading to Recreation 7 at Amerant Financial institution Enviornment in Dawn, Florida on Monday (8 p.m. ET; ABC, ESPN+, SN, TVAS, CBC). Win that one, and Edmonton will be a part of the 1942 Toronto Maple Leafs as the one groups to return again from a 3-0 deficit within the Last and win a Stanley Cup.
And if that does occur, historical past will present that the decision by Knoblauch was a key second on the Oilers’ highway to the title.
The play in query occurred at 56 seconds of the second interval, simply 10 seconds after Oilers ahead Adam Henrique had widened Edmonton’s result in 2-0. With the gang nonetheless buzzing in regards to the Oilers’ second objective, Florida instantly responded with a line rush that resulted in a objective by Aleksander Barkov, immediately siphoning the vitality out of raucous Rogers Place and giving momentum to the Panthers with the sport now tight at 2-1.
Or so everybody thought.
Not so quick.
Knoblauch and quite a few his gamers felt the play main as much as Barkov’s objective was offside on the blue line. After conferring together with his employees, he challenged the play.
Preserve this in thoughts: had he misplaced the problem, the Oilers would have been assessed a delay of recreation penalty. Not solely would the Panthers be inside one objective, they might additionally instantly go to the ability play.
However he didn’t lose it and, as such, seemed like a genius.
Once more.
“I really didn’t suppose it was that shut,” Knoblauch mentioned of the play. “We have been going to name it immediately however we did have a little bit time to evaluate it and mentioned ‘OK.’ Possibly the one hesitation was that perhaps there wasn’t the precise angle on the video.
“In my thoughts it was positively offside. It was one thing we needed to problem nearly instantly once we noticed it.”
Panthers coach Paul Maurice wasn’t so positive.
“I do not know (in the event that they received it proper),” he mentioned. “It might effectively have been offside. The traces particular person knowledgeable me that it was the final clip that they received the place they made the choice that exhibits it’s offside. I don’t have these. So the video I received on my bench, I used to be upset after the decision primarily based on what I see at my toes, what my video particular person seems at.
“There was no method I might’ve challenged that if it was reversed, there was no method I believed you can conclusively say that was offside. I don’t know what the Oilers get, I don’t know what the league will get. I simply know that after I would’ve needed to have challenged that primarily based on what I noticed, I might not have challenged. I’m not saying it isn’t offside. We’ll get nonetheless frames, deliver within the CIA, we’ll determine it out. However within the 30 seconds that I might’ve made that decision, I might not have challenged.”
Certainly, due to the Oilers’ third consecutive win, the sequence is now deadlocked at 3-3 heading to Recreation 7 at Amerant Financial institution Enviornment in Dawn, Florida on Monday (8 p.m. ET; ABC, ESPN+, SN, TVAS, CBC). Win that one, and Edmonton will be a part of the 1942 Toronto Maple Leafs as the one groups to return again from a 3-0 deficit within the Last and win a Stanley Cup.
And if that does occur, historical past will present that the decision by Knoblauch was a key second on the Oilers’ highway to the title.
The play in query occurred at 56 seconds of the second interval, simply 10 seconds after Oilers ahead Adam Henrique had widened Edmonton’s result in 2-0. With the gang nonetheless buzzing in regards to the Oilers’ second objective, Florida instantly responded with a line rush that resulted in a objective by Aleksander Barkov, immediately siphoning the vitality out of raucous Rogers Place and giving momentum to the Panthers with the sport now tight at 2-1.
Or so everybody thought.
Not so quick.
Knoblauch and quite a few his gamers felt the play main as much as Barkov’s objective was offside on the blue line. After conferring together with his employees, he challenged the play.
Preserve this in thoughts: had he misplaced the problem, the Oilers would have been assessed a delay of recreation penalty. Not solely would the Panthers be inside one objective, they might additionally instantly go to the ability play.
However he didn’t lose it and, as such, seemed like a genius.
Once more.
“I really didn’t suppose it was that shut,” Knoblauch mentioned of the play. “We have been going to name it immediately however we did have a little bit time to evaluate it and mentioned ‘OK.’ Possibly the one hesitation was that perhaps there wasn’t the precise angle on the video.
“In my thoughts it was positively offside. It was one thing we needed to problem nearly instantly once we noticed it.”
Panthers coach Paul Maurice wasn’t so positive.
“I do not know (in the event that they received it proper),” he mentioned. “It might effectively have been offside. The traces particular person knowledgeable me that it was the final clip that they received the place they made the choice that exhibits it’s offside. I don’t have these. So the video I received on my bench, I used to be upset after the decision primarily based on what I see at my toes, what my video particular person seems at.
“There was no method I might’ve challenged that if it was reversed, there was no method I believed you can conclusively say that was offside. I don’t know what the Oilers get, I don’t know what the league will get. I simply know that after I would’ve needed to have challenged that primarily based on what I noticed, I might not have challenged. I’m not saying it isn’t offside. We’ll get nonetheless frames, deliver within the CIA, we’ll determine it out. However within the 30 seconds that I might’ve made that decision, I might not have challenged.”
Certainly, due to the Oilers’ third consecutive win, the sequence is now deadlocked at 3-3 heading to Recreation 7 at Amerant Financial institution Enviornment in Dawn, Florida on Monday (8 p.m. ET; ABC, ESPN+, SN, TVAS, CBC). Win that one, and Edmonton will be a part of the 1942 Toronto Maple Leafs as the one groups to return again from a 3-0 deficit within the Last and win a Stanley Cup.
And if that does occur, historical past will present that the decision by Knoblauch was a key second on the Oilers’ highway to the title.
The play in query occurred at 56 seconds of the second interval, simply 10 seconds after Oilers ahead Adam Henrique had widened Edmonton’s result in 2-0. With the gang nonetheless buzzing in regards to the Oilers’ second objective, Florida instantly responded with a line rush that resulted in a objective by Aleksander Barkov, immediately siphoning the vitality out of raucous Rogers Place and giving momentum to the Panthers with the sport now tight at 2-1.
Or so everybody thought.
Not so quick.
Knoblauch and quite a few his gamers felt the play main as much as Barkov’s objective was offside on the blue line. After conferring together with his employees, he challenged the play.
Preserve this in thoughts: had he misplaced the problem, the Oilers would have been assessed a delay of recreation penalty. Not solely would the Panthers be inside one objective, they might additionally instantly go to the ability play.
However he didn’t lose it and, as such, seemed like a genius.
Once more.
“I really didn’t suppose it was that shut,” Knoblauch mentioned of the play. “We have been going to name it immediately however we did have a little bit time to evaluate it and mentioned ‘OK.’ Possibly the one hesitation was that perhaps there wasn’t the precise angle on the video.
“In my thoughts it was positively offside. It was one thing we needed to problem nearly instantly once we noticed it.”
Panthers coach Paul Maurice wasn’t so positive.
“I do not know (in the event that they received it proper),” he mentioned. “It might effectively have been offside. The traces particular person knowledgeable me that it was the final clip that they received the place they made the choice that exhibits it’s offside. I don’t have these. So the video I received on my bench, I used to be upset after the decision primarily based on what I see at my toes, what my video particular person seems at.
“There was no method I might’ve challenged that if it was reversed, there was no method I believed you can conclusively say that was offside. I don’t know what the Oilers get, I don’t know what the league will get. I simply know that after I would’ve needed to have challenged that primarily based on what I noticed, I might not have challenged. I’m not saying it isn’t offside. We’ll get nonetheless frames, deliver within the CIA, we’ll determine it out. However within the 30 seconds that I might’ve made that decision, I might not have challenged.”
Certainly, due to the Oilers’ third consecutive win, the sequence is now deadlocked at 3-3 heading to Recreation 7 at Amerant Financial institution Enviornment in Dawn, Florida on Monday (8 p.m. ET; ABC, ESPN+, SN, TVAS, CBC). Win that one, and Edmonton will be a part of the 1942 Toronto Maple Leafs as the one groups to return again from a 3-0 deficit within the Last and win a Stanley Cup.
And if that does occur, historical past will present that the decision by Knoblauch was a key second on the Oilers’ highway to the title.
The play in query occurred at 56 seconds of the second interval, simply 10 seconds after Oilers ahead Adam Henrique had widened Edmonton’s result in 2-0. With the gang nonetheless buzzing in regards to the Oilers’ second objective, Florida instantly responded with a line rush that resulted in a objective by Aleksander Barkov, immediately siphoning the vitality out of raucous Rogers Place and giving momentum to the Panthers with the sport now tight at 2-1.
Or so everybody thought.
Not so quick.
Knoblauch and quite a few his gamers felt the play main as much as Barkov’s objective was offside on the blue line. After conferring together with his employees, he challenged the play.
Preserve this in thoughts: had he misplaced the problem, the Oilers would have been assessed a delay of recreation penalty. Not solely would the Panthers be inside one objective, they might additionally instantly go to the ability play.
However he didn’t lose it and, as such, seemed like a genius.
Once more.
“I really didn’t suppose it was that shut,” Knoblauch mentioned of the play. “We have been going to name it immediately however we did have a little bit time to evaluate it and mentioned ‘OK.’ Possibly the one hesitation was that perhaps there wasn’t the precise angle on the video.
“In my thoughts it was positively offside. It was one thing we needed to problem nearly instantly once we noticed it.”
Panthers coach Paul Maurice wasn’t so positive.
“I do not know (in the event that they received it proper),” he mentioned. “It might effectively have been offside. The traces particular person knowledgeable me that it was the final clip that they received the place they made the choice that exhibits it’s offside. I don’t have these. So the video I received on my bench, I used to be upset after the decision primarily based on what I see at my toes, what my video particular person seems at.
“There was no method I might’ve challenged that if it was reversed, there was no method I believed you can conclusively say that was offside. I don’t know what the Oilers get, I don’t know what the league will get. I simply know that after I would’ve needed to have challenged that primarily based on what I noticed, I might not have challenged. I’m not saying it isn’t offside. We’ll get nonetheless frames, deliver within the CIA, we’ll determine it out. However within the 30 seconds that I might’ve made that decision, I might not have challenged.”
Certainly, due to the Oilers’ third consecutive win, the sequence is now deadlocked at 3-3 heading to Recreation 7 at Amerant Financial institution Enviornment in Dawn, Florida on Monday (8 p.m. ET; ABC, ESPN+, SN, TVAS, CBC). Win that one, and Edmonton will be a part of the 1942 Toronto Maple Leafs as the one groups to return again from a 3-0 deficit within the Last and win a Stanley Cup.
And if that does occur, historical past will present that the decision by Knoblauch was a key second on the Oilers’ highway to the title.
The play in query occurred at 56 seconds of the second interval, simply 10 seconds after Oilers ahead Adam Henrique had widened Edmonton’s result in 2-0. With the gang nonetheless buzzing in regards to the Oilers’ second objective, Florida instantly responded with a line rush that resulted in a objective by Aleksander Barkov, immediately siphoning the vitality out of raucous Rogers Place and giving momentum to the Panthers with the sport now tight at 2-1.
Or so everybody thought.
Not so quick.
Knoblauch and quite a few his gamers felt the play main as much as Barkov’s objective was offside on the blue line. After conferring together with his employees, he challenged the play.
Preserve this in thoughts: had he misplaced the problem, the Oilers would have been assessed a delay of recreation penalty. Not solely would the Panthers be inside one objective, they might additionally instantly go to the ability play.
However he didn’t lose it and, as such, seemed like a genius.
Once more.
“I really didn’t suppose it was that shut,” Knoblauch mentioned of the play. “We have been going to name it immediately however we did have a little bit time to evaluate it and mentioned ‘OK.’ Possibly the one hesitation was that perhaps there wasn’t the precise angle on the video.
“In my thoughts it was positively offside. It was one thing we needed to problem nearly instantly once we noticed it.”
Panthers coach Paul Maurice wasn’t so positive.
“I do not know (in the event that they received it proper),” he mentioned. “It might effectively have been offside. The traces particular person knowledgeable me that it was the final clip that they received the place they made the choice that exhibits it’s offside. I don’t have these. So the video I received on my bench, I used to be upset after the decision primarily based on what I see at my toes, what my video particular person seems at.
“There was no method I might’ve challenged that if it was reversed, there was no method I believed you can conclusively say that was offside. I don’t know what the Oilers get, I don’t know what the league will get. I simply know that after I would’ve needed to have challenged that primarily based on what I noticed, I might not have challenged. I’m not saying it isn’t offside. We’ll get nonetheless frames, deliver within the CIA, we’ll determine it out. However within the 30 seconds that I might’ve made that decision, I might not have challenged.”