Within the weeks main as much as a committee vote on a invoice that will dismantle variety, fairness and inclusion places of work at public schools throughout Kentucky, Michael Frazier went on the lookout for suggestions and help from college students.
Frazier met College of Louisville pupil Rebekah Flowers on that tour and requested her to jot down a letter about her expertise with DEI on her campus. Flowers says she agreed to offer suggestions anonymously.
Although she had complaints about a few of the DEI places of work on campus, Flowers mentioned she opposes efforts to dismantle DEI and hoped her phrases would scale back the hurt the invoice would have on college students like her, Flowers instructed Kentucky Public Radio.
As a substitute, she says Frazier used her identify publicly in opposition to her needs, and inserted a line in her letter insinuating her help for elements of the laws whereas testifying to lawmakers.
Hers was the one testimony from an individual of coloration allegedly in favor of the laws on the March committee listening to. Flowers mentioned she was shocked to listen to Frazier say her identify on the listening to after which put phrases in her mouth.
“It was form of discouraging. I really feel like going into this house, as a pupil, and I am already feeling a bit of bizarre,” Flowers mentioned. “I felt like I would not have been taken benefit of in that approach. And so it left a bitter style in my mouth of emotions of mistrust.”
KPR reviewed textual content messages and emails supporting that Frazier publicly used her identify in opposition to her needs, although he mentioned it was unintentional in texts to Flowers. Frazier has since instructed KPR he believed he had permission to make use of Flowers’ identify.
KPR additionally reviewed each the listening to and copies of Flowers’ assertion. Frazier inserted an extra sentence within the midst of studying her assertion, whereas beneath oath — the one point out of the laws within the assertion.
“I learn her letter in full, together with that she does help variety, fairness and inclusion,” Frazier mentioned.
Frazier is a lobbyist for Ban Conversion Remedy and infrequently speaks on First Modification rights points earlier than the legislature. He has additionally been closely concerned with the anti-DEI laws, testifying on the identical desk as Republican Rep. Jennifer Decker of Waddy, who carried the invoice within the Home, earlier than a committee vote. Nonetheless, Frazier says he didn’t help the laws in his capability at a lobbyist.
Frazier mentioned he believed Flowers to be in help of “tenets of the invoice,” if not the invoice itself. He didn’t suppose it was deceptive to both add a sentence or to make use of her assertion within the portion of the testimony expressly put aside for supporters of the laws, he mentioned.
He instructed KPR he believed the assertion precisely mirrored Flowers’ views and the truth that he seemed up from Flowers’ assertion so as to say the added sentence implied it was ad-libbed.
Frazier additionally modified the unique assertion, including a line on the high addressing it to the committee and one other on the backside to incorporate Flowers’ identify and campus positions. He mentioned he believes Flowers was compelled to vary her opinion in regards to the invoice after “a tremendous quantity of strain” from the scholar physique and DEI officers.
Flowers denies that allegation. Her mom, Nicole Flowers, mentioned she believes her daughter was used as “a pawn” for political ends.
“Her character was questioned,” Nicole Flowers mentioned. “It takes a very long time to construct and moments to destroy.”
‘I used to be instructed I used to be making a distinction’
Senate Invoice 6, in its present kind, would ban all DEI initiatives, places of work and positions at public schools in Kentucky. It might not enable any educational packages to require programs that embrace DEI. It might ban any scholarships that give desire on the premise of race, nationwide origin or intercourse.
It’s a part of a wave of conservative laws throughout the nation condemning variety, fairness and inclusion efforts as divisive and discriminatory in opposition to right-wing school and college students. Simply final week, Alabama’s governor signed the same ban into legislation.
Rebekah Flowers was first approached by Frazier a number of weeks in the past, when he did a tour of campuses to speak in regards to the anti-DEI invoice he was pushing, she mentioned. Flowers is a College of Louisville pupil, a Martin Luther King Jr. scholar, a member of the Scholar Authorities Affiliation and a Black girl.
She was in a glass blowing class when she came upon that Frazier had misrepresented her phrases, and publicly named her.
“I am having a good time. After which I get a textual content,” Flowers mentioned.
In well mannered phrases, the buddy instructed her that individuals have been upset — how might she out of the blue help anti-DEI laws?
“I instantly put down the [glass blowing tool]… and I known as the person who texted me that and I used to be like, ‘What do you imply?’” Flowers mentioned. “I by no means wrote a press release in help of SB 6.”
Underneath oath, Frazier instructed the Home Schooling committee that Flowers was “unable to affix us” for the listening to — Flowers mentioned she communicated she would not be attending and deliberate to stay nameless.
Then, in the midst of delivering Flowers’ assertion, Frazier inserted a single sentence. It referenced issues that cultural useful resource facilities would lose funding.
“I am glad to see that in SB 6 within the Senate substitute, this isn’t true,” Frazier mentioned with out pause within the midst of studying Flowers’ assertion.
The assertion Flowers offered doesn’t embrace that sentence. Nor does it embrace any reference to SB 6. Flowers mentioned the added assertion implied she was in favor of the invoice or glad that it was being introduced ahead — neither of that are true. If she ever mentioned such a factor, it was as a result of she was glad the invoice was barely higher than the worst state of affairs, she mentioned.
Frazier mentioned he had cause to imagine the assertion was correct, even when it was nowhere to be present in Flowers’ assertion. Frazier mentioned he believed members of the committee and people watching knew he was ad-libbing.
“Now there’s a level the place I did search for and clarified that after reviewing SB 6 as amended, Rebecca was glad that the useful resource facilities weren’t closed in SB 6,” Frazier mentioned.
Flowers says she had not learn the amended model of the invoice and that she purposefully didn’t reference the laws in any respect.
She says she’s been vocal on campus about her issues along with her college’s Workplace of Institutional Fairness, however does that imply she desires that division or another variety workplace to shut its doorways?
“After all not,” Flowers mentioned. “I do not suppose that it’s essential to remove departments attributable to discontent.”
Flowers mentioned that anti-DEI laws is an “an assault on the crux and integrity of what makes universities nice,” and she or he’s been against it because it was launched within the state legislature.
Flowers mentioned she thought her place was clear to each Frazier and Decker, who shepherded the laws by way of the Home, with whom Flowers briefly met. Decker sat subsequent to Frazier as he learn Flowers’ assertion.
DEI places of work, whether or not they’re the very best they may very well be in any respect universities, are designed to assist college students like her, Flowers mentioned, and she or he doesn’t wish to see them stripped away. The letter, which Flowers mentioned meant to criticize and name for some reforms inside DEI places of work, was learn throughout a portion of the listening to meant for supporters.
Flowers mentioned she was instructed the invoice was primarily a certain factor, and her solely choice was to attempt to at the least make it much less dangerous to numerous college students.
In textual content messages, Frazier instructed Flowers that extra important modifications can be forthcoming to the laws. On March 16, Frazier texted, “Rep. Decker took your enter significantly. We’re going to add provision to direct extra funding to scholarships, useful resource facilities and useful resource middle employees.”
That provision has but to be added to the laws. Flowers mentioned that was the primary factor she believed she had helped add to the invoice.
“I used to be instructed I used to be making a distinction,” Flowers mentioned.
In textual content messages offered to KPR, Flowers confronted Frazier about utilizing her identify. Frazier responded, “I simply rewatched. I learn the entire thing and didn’t imply to do it deliberately. I simply learn the entire thing and notes.” Frazier additionally included Flowers’ identify and positions in press supplies.
‘I do wish to nonetheless be concerned.’
Frazier claims that DEI officers pressured Flowers after the very fact into opposing the invoice, which Flowers denies. In texts to Frazier, Flowers did say she initially felt attacked.
“DEI workers have leaked her identify to college students, have created a hostile atmosphere and have made her really feel unsafe and attacked on campus,” Frazier mentioned.
Flowers mentioned she doesn’t imagine DEI officers are encouraging any college students to assault her and she or he has largely acquired help from college students after she explains how her assertion was misrepresented.
Flowers mentioned the invoice damage her character on campus. As an avid supporter of DEI initiatives, Flowers mentioned she understood why different college students can be upset after they heard her assertion had been utilized in help of assaults in opposition to DEI.
She says she is resolute that DEI holds an vital place on campuses. Flowers says that after this expertise, she has a “bitter style” in her mouth, however intends to proceed making her voice heard.
“I do wish to nonetheless be concerned. I do wish to proceed to advocate for college kids, as a result of it is vital,” Flowers mentioned. “And I do not remorse going and talking my thoughts, as a result of that is who I’m. And that is what’s vital to me.”
Clarification: This story has been up to date to make clear that Michael Frazier was not performing in his capability as a lobbyist in his help of Senate Invoice 6.
window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({
appId : '369188845009402',
xfbml : true, version : 'v2.9' }); };
(function(d, s, id){ var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));