Jonathan Van Ness slammed the bombshell report claiming they had been emotionally “abusive” on the set of “Queer Eye” as being not “based mostly in actuality” practically 4 months after the piece was first printed.
“I feel lots of people had been like on the lookout for a purpose to hate me or like on the lookout for a purpose to be like, ‘See, I at all times knew that they had been a pretend c–t and that is the proof,’” the fact star, who goes by they/he/she pronouns, stated on the “Desk Manners with Jessie and Lennie Ware” podcast Tuesday.
“My household was so supportive of my husband and my group, however I didn’t even get on social media or, like, take a look at my cellphone for 3 weeks.”
Van Ness, 37, stated they and their “Queer Eye” castmates first discovered of the investigative profile in December 2023, and claimed that loads of the data gathered was “taken out of context” to make them look “as unhealthy as attainable.”
Jonathan Van Ness responded to allegations about their conduct on the set of “Queer Eye.” Getty Photographs for Vivienne Tam
A number of manufacturing sources claimed Van Ness was tough to work with. ILANA PANICH-LINSMAN/NETFLIX
“I feel individuals neglect irrespective of how well-known you might be you’re nonetheless an individual,” the TV character added.
“That article got here at like an extremely weak time, like for my hair care firm, for like my entire profession. It simply was actually tough.”
Van Ness then stated that the article was “overwhelmingly unfaithful” and allegedly carried out “in unhealthy religion,” however admitted that there could have been occasions once they snapped at individuals or “might have been higher.”
In March, Rolling Stone printed the damning exposé, which accused Van Ness of “rage points.”
Seven manufacturing sources who spoke to the outlet claimed the hairstylist’s behind-the-scenes conduct contributed to the rift throughout the unique Fab 5, alleging Van Ness would lash out at crew members.
Van Ness, who has been a fan favourite on the present since its premiere in 2018, allegedly had “rage points” behind the scenes. Getty Photographs
Insiders used phrases like “monster,” “nightmare” and “demeaning” to explain the hairstylist. jvn/Instagram
“He didn’t need to ever share the highlight with anybody. There have been occasions after we couldn’t even shoot scenes with sure members of the Fab 5 collectively as a result of it acquired so unhealthy,” one insider stated, referencing Van Ness’ co-stars Tan France, Antoni Porowski, Karamo Brown and Bobby Berk, who has since left the present.
Others described Van Ness as a “monster,” “nightmare” and “demeaning.”
“[There’s] an actual emotion of worry round them once they get indignant. It’s virtually like a cartoon the place it oozes out of them,” one supply defined.
“It’s intense and scary,” they went on, noting that Van Ness was a “yeller” who would explode at the least as soon as per week. One other supply stated there was at all times “pressure” on the set, significantly with Van Ness.
The allegations are a stark distinction to Van Ness’ public persona. Getty Photographs for Netflix
“As a lot good as he needs to do on this planet, I feel loads of it is rather hypocritical,” one supply stated of the non-binary activist. jvn/Instagram
“When he comes on set, every little thing adjustments if he’s in a foul temper,” they defined. “Working with him may be very tough in any capability.”
The allegations starkly distinction Van Ness’ public persona, which made them a fan favourite amongst viewers of the Netflix hit.
“Jonathan’s an individual who comprises multitudes and who has the capability to be very heat, very charismatic, and has the capability to make you’re feeling actually particular that they’re listening to you,” one supply stated.
Cracks between the Fab 5 seemingly started to point out when Bobby Berk (second from the left) left the sequence in 2023. jvn/Instagram
There was at all times “pressure” on the set, in line with one insider. Instagram/jvn
“However at the least as soon as a day, they would want to yell at someone. It could be one thing small, however there’s at all times going to be someone to level out and blame and make the villain of the day.”
A separate manufacturing supply described the Cosmopolitan cowl star, who has change into a pioneer for trans rights points, as “hypocritical.”
“As a lot good as he needs to do on this planet, I feel loads of it is rather hypocritical,” the supply stated.
“There’s a particular distinction between the rules and the values that Jonathan stands for publicly. They’re actually centered round having this heat, love, and take care of different individuals.
The present is about to return to Netflix for a ninth season. Carin Baer/Netflix
Van Ness is about to return for the brand new season. Getty Photographs
“There’s an actual distinction between that and the best way that they deal with the people who find themselves closest to them throughout the board. It’s the other of what this individual is touted and paid to be.”
Berk, 42, who was the present’s design skilled, introduced his departure from the sequence in 2023 after eight seasons and later confirmed he had pressure with France, 41.
Nevertheless, the British designer disputed the declare made in Rolling Stone’s piece that alleged he campaigned to get Berk fired with the intention to get his pal Jeremiah Brent the job.
Need extra movie star and popular culture information?
Begin your day with Web page Six Each day.
Thanks for signing up!
Tan France has additionally disputed a number of the claims in Rolling Stone’s report. Getty Photographs for Netflix
He denied conspiring to get Bobby Berk fired. Getty Photographs
France just isn’t the one individual to try to poke holes within the scandalous report, although.
A number of former contributors — dubbed “Hometown Heroes” — got here ahead to defend Van Ness, claiming that they had at all times been “vivid and good” on set.
“Queer Eye,” which premiered in 2018, will return for a ninth season set in Las Vegas.