The Giants’ choice to let operating again Saquon Barkley stroll in free company was a calculation that with how a lot they’ve invested in quarterback Daniel Jones, they’re not paying him at hand off.
That’s how Giants Normal Supervisor Joe Schoen described it in a personnel assembly proven in the latest episode of Arduous Knocks. As Schoen mentioned why he didn’t need to put the franchise tag on Barkley or signal him to a profitable contract extension, he mentioned that it finally comes right down to the $40 million per yr contract the Giants have given Jones.
“You’re paying the man $40 million. It’s to not hand the ball off to a $12 million again,” Schoen mentioned.
It’s simply the truth of as we speak’s NFL that quarterbacks are way more helpful than operating backs, and a workforce that has already invested plenty of wage cap area in its beginning quarterback often received’t use plenty of the remaining area on a operating again. However the query is whether or not the funding the Giants made in Jones was a smart one. Schoen acknowledged that the Giants want Jones to show himself in 2024, the second yr of his contract, or the Giants might want to transfer on.
“That is the yr for Daniel,” Schoen mentioned. “The plan all alongside was to offer him a pair years. Is he our man for the following 10 years? Or do we have to pivot and go discover another person?”
window.fbAsyncInit = function() { FB.init({
appId : '402627290431349',
xfbml : true, version : 'v2.9' }); };
(function(d, s, id){ var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));