Mere minutes after a mistrial was declared Monday within the controversial Karen Learn homicide case, prosecutors introduced they plan to re-try the case. A listening to is already set for July 22 to begin to decide how that course of will transfer ahead.
However what would possibly a second Karen Learn trial seem like, and the way may it differ from the primary? Our authorized consultants did a deep dive on this throughout Monday’s episode of “Canton Confidential,” even answering some viewer questions on what to anticipate.
“I am not stunned they are going to re-try it,” stated Katherine Loftus, a Boston legal professional with Loftus & Loftus PC. “The commonwealth believes Karen Learn is responsible. And you’ve got the surface secondary subject, actually they have been accused — the workplace itself, legislation enforcement, all people concerned — of this cover-up, so I believe they’ve type of a two-fold objective of the subsequent case.”
However she stated she expects to see a really totally different case the second time round.
“I do suppose they should shorten it,” Loftus stated. “I believe that one of many many issues the commonwealth had was they actually targeted an excessive amount of on the protection concept. I believe they should actually on the entrance finish perhaps name a couple of witnesses, oen or two poliec officers, one or two civilians. It is all of the extras that we do not want. Concentrate on the proof, what the power of their case is.”
She additionally stated she would not be stunned if a particular prosecutor is introduced in to help Assistant District Legal professional Adam Lally.
“You want somebody stylistically, somebody to go toe-to-toe with whoever it’ll be — David Yannetti, who is aware of if Alan Jackson goes to remain on. Clearly, as you stated, it prices some huge cash to re-try a case like this.”
“I believe each side are going to take a while, tweak what they did the primary time round and we’ll see which approach it comes out.”
Sue O’Connell, NBC10 Boston commentator and analyst, agreed that specializing in the proof will probably be key to the prosecution’s case within the second trial, since that is what jurors appeared most concerned about.
“One factor we all know the jurors reviewed — they wished to know extra concerning the SERT search, the gathering of proof on the Alberts’ property,” she stated. “We all know plenty of stuff they did not appear to care about simply because they did not ask for more information or search extra information. So I believe that is a clue, to your level, that every one this different defending of alleged different folks they did not find out about did not appear to attach with them. It was concerning the proof.”
The homicide trial of Karen Learn ends in a mistrial, because the jury couldn’t give you a unanimous verdict. Whereas this particular in opposition to Learn could also be over, her authorized street is way from over. And this morning, there’s new fallout within the aftermath of the choice.
However what if there’s one other mistrial? What number of instances can the case be re-tried?
“As many because it takes until they get a verdict,” stated Michael Coyne, dean of the Massachusetts College of Legislation. The very fact is what we’ve got here’s a mistrial after one. They will attempt her once more. As a sensible matter, they don’t seem to be going to attempt her until the top of time, however they may in actual fact seemingly proceed to attempt her till they attain a verdict in some way.”
One other subject will seemingly entail discovering an neutral jury, given how a lot consideration the case has acquired. However Loftus stated she would not suppose that will probably be a serious concern.
“I believe it is attention-grabbing, as a result of we truly had this similar dialog about choosing a jury in April. Folks had been so positive they could not choose a jury.”
“I believe folks could be stunned,” Loftus added. “For all of us consumed by this, following it on daily basis, it looks as if there isn’t any approach you possibly can discover jurors who do not know something about this. However I believe, in actual fact, I believe you possibly can discover a honest jury. It would take a little bit bit extra time, you might need to undergo 200-300 such as you did the primary time.”
She stated it is also potential that the venue might be moved, or jurors might be taken from one other county. However she would not suppose that can finally be needed.
“I do not suppose it is going to be an issue discovering it,” Loftus stated. “It would simply take a little bit extra work.”
Mere minutes after a mistrial was declared Monday within the controversial Karen Learn homicide case, prosecutors introduced they plan to re-try the case. A listening to is already set for July 22 to begin to decide how that course of will transfer ahead.
However what would possibly a second Karen Learn trial seem like, and the way may it differ from the primary? Our authorized consultants did a deep dive on this throughout Monday’s episode of “Canton Confidential,” even answering some viewer questions on what to anticipate.
“I am not stunned they are going to re-try it,” stated Katherine Loftus, a Boston legal professional with Loftus & Loftus PC. “The commonwealth believes Karen Learn is responsible. And you’ve got the surface secondary subject, actually they have been accused — the workplace itself, legislation enforcement, all people concerned — of this cover-up, so I believe they’ve type of a two-fold objective of the subsequent case.”
However she stated she expects to see a really totally different case the second time round.
“I do suppose they should shorten it,” Loftus stated. “I believe that one of many many issues the commonwealth had was they actually targeted an excessive amount of on the protection concept. I believe they should actually on the entrance finish perhaps name a couple of witnesses, oen or two poliec officers, one or two civilians. It is all of the extras that we do not want. Concentrate on the proof, what the power of their case is.”
She additionally stated she would not be stunned if a particular prosecutor is introduced in to help Assistant District Legal professional Adam Lally.
“You want somebody stylistically, somebody to go toe-to-toe with whoever it’ll be — David Yannetti, who is aware of if Alan Jackson goes to remain on. Clearly, as you stated, it prices some huge cash to re-try a case like this.”
“I believe each side are going to take a while, tweak what they did the primary time round and we’ll see which approach it comes out.”
Sue O’Connell, NBC10 Boston commentator and analyst, agreed that specializing in the proof will probably be key to the prosecution’s case within the second trial, since that is what jurors appeared most concerned about.
“One factor we all know the jurors reviewed — they wished to know extra concerning the SERT search, the gathering of proof on the Alberts’ property,” she stated. “We all know plenty of stuff they did not appear to care about simply because they did not ask for more information or search extra information. So I believe that is a clue, to your level, that every one this different defending of alleged different folks they did not find out about did not appear to attach with them. It was concerning the proof.”
The homicide trial of Karen Learn ends in a mistrial, because the jury couldn’t give you a unanimous verdict. Whereas this particular in opposition to Learn could also be over, her authorized street is way from over. And this morning, there’s new fallout within the aftermath of the choice.
However what if there’s one other mistrial? What number of instances can the case be re-tried?
“As many because it takes until they get a verdict,” stated Michael Coyne, dean of the Massachusetts College of Legislation. The very fact is what we’ve got here’s a mistrial after one. They will attempt her once more. As a sensible matter, they don’t seem to be going to attempt her until the top of time, however they may in actual fact seemingly proceed to attempt her till they attain a verdict in some way.”
One other subject will seemingly entail discovering an neutral jury, given how a lot consideration the case has acquired. However Loftus stated she would not suppose that will probably be a serious concern.
“I believe it is attention-grabbing, as a result of we truly had this similar dialog about choosing a jury in April. Folks had been so positive they could not choose a jury.”
“I believe folks could be stunned,” Loftus added. “For all of us consumed by this, following it on daily basis, it looks as if there isn’t any approach you possibly can discover jurors who do not know something about this. However I believe, in actual fact, I believe you possibly can discover a honest jury. It would take a little bit bit extra time, you might need to undergo 200-300 such as you did the primary time.”
She stated it is also potential that the venue might be moved, or jurors might be taken from one other county. However she would not suppose that can finally be needed.
“I do not suppose it is going to be an issue discovering it,” Loftus stated. “It would simply take a little bit extra work.”
Mere minutes after a mistrial was declared Monday within the controversial Karen Learn homicide case, prosecutors introduced they plan to re-try the case. A listening to is already set for July 22 to begin to decide how that course of will transfer ahead.
However what would possibly a second Karen Learn trial seem like, and the way may it differ from the primary? Our authorized consultants did a deep dive on this throughout Monday’s episode of “Canton Confidential,” even answering some viewer questions on what to anticipate.
“I am not stunned they are going to re-try it,” stated Katherine Loftus, a Boston legal professional with Loftus & Loftus PC. “The commonwealth believes Karen Learn is responsible. And you’ve got the surface secondary subject, actually they have been accused — the workplace itself, legislation enforcement, all people concerned — of this cover-up, so I believe they’ve type of a two-fold objective of the subsequent case.”
However she stated she expects to see a really totally different case the second time round.
“I do suppose they should shorten it,” Loftus stated. “I believe that one of many many issues the commonwealth had was they actually targeted an excessive amount of on the protection concept. I believe they should actually on the entrance finish perhaps name a couple of witnesses, oen or two poliec officers, one or two civilians. It is all of the extras that we do not want. Concentrate on the proof, what the power of their case is.”
She additionally stated she would not be stunned if a particular prosecutor is introduced in to help Assistant District Legal professional Adam Lally.
“You want somebody stylistically, somebody to go toe-to-toe with whoever it’ll be — David Yannetti, who is aware of if Alan Jackson goes to remain on. Clearly, as you stated, it prices some huge cash to re-try a case like this.”
“I believe each side are going to take a while, tweak what they did the primary time round and we’ll see which approach it comes out.”
Sue O’Connell, NBC10 Boston commentator and analyst, agreed that specializing in the proof will probably be key to the prosecution’s case within the second trial, since that is what jurors appeared most concerned about.
“One factor we all know the jurors reviewed — they wished to know extra concerning the SERT search, the gathering of proof on the Alberts’ property,” she stated. “We all know plenty of stuff they did not appear to care about simply because they did not ask for more information or search extra information. So I believe that is a clue, to your level, that every one this different defending of alleged different folks they did not find out about did not appear to attach with them. It was concerning the proof.”
The homicide trial of Karen Learn ends in a mistrial, because the jury couldn’t give you a unanimous verdict. Whereas this particular in opposition to Learn could also be over, her authorized street is way from over. And this morning, there’s new fallout within the aftermath of the choice.
However what if there’s one other mistrial? What number of instances can the case be re-tried?
“As many because it takes until they get a verdict,” stated Michael Coyne, dean of the Massachusetts College of Legislation. The very fact is what we’ve got here’s a mistrial after one. They will attempt her once more. As a sensible matter, they don’t seem to be going to attempt her until the top of time, however they may in actual fact seemingly proceed to attempt her till they attain a verdict in some way.”
One other subject will seemingly entail discovering an neutral jury, given how a lot consideration the case has acquired. However Loftus stated she would not suppose that will probably be a serious concern.
“I believe it is attention-grabbing, as a result of we truly had this similar dialog about choosing a jury in April. Folks had been so positive they could not choose a jury.”
“I believe folks could be stunned,” Loftus added. “For all of us consumed by this, following it on daily basis, it looks as if there isn’t any approach you possibly can discover jurors who do not know something about this. However I believe, in actual fact, I believe you possibly can discover a honest jury. It would take a little bit bit extra time, you might need to undergo 200-300 such as you did the primary time.”
She stated it is also potential that the venue might be moved, or jurors might be taken from one other county. However she would not suppose that can finally be needed.
“I do not suppose it is going to be an issue discovering it,” Loftus stated. “It would simply take a little bit extra work.”
Mere minutes after a mistrial was declared Monday within the controversial Karen Learn homicide case, prosecutors introduced they plan to re-try the case. A listening to is already set for July 22 to begin to decide how that course of will transfer ahead.
However what would possibly a second Karen Learn trial seem like, and the way may it differ from the primary? Our authorized consultants did a deep dive on this throughout Monday’s episode of “Canton Confidential,” even answering some viewer questions on what to anticipate.
“I am not stunned they are going to re-try it,” stated Katherine Loftus, a Boston legal professional with Loftus & Loftus PC. “The commonwealth believes Karen Learn is responsible. And you’ve got the surface secondary subject, actually they have been accused — the workplace itself, legislation enforcement, all people concerned — of this cover-up, so I believe they’ve type of a two-fold objective of the subsequent case.”
However she stated she expects to see a really totally different case the second time round.
“I do suppose they should shorten it,” Loftus stated. “I believe that one of many many issues the commonwealth had was they actually targeted an excessive amount of on the protection concept. I believe they should actually on the entrance finish perhaps name a couple of witnesses, oen or two poliec officers, one or two civilians. It is all of the extras that we do not want. Concentrate on the proof, what the power of their case is.”
She additionally stated she would not be stunned if a particular prosecutor is introduced in to help Assistant District Legal professional Adam Lally.
“You want somebody stylistically, somebody to go toe-to-toe with whoever it’ll be — David Yannetti, who is aware of if Alan Jackson goes to remain on. Clearly, as you stated, it prices some huge cash to re-try a case like this.”
“I believe each side are going to take a while, tweak what they did the primary time round and we’ll see which approach it comes out.”
Sue O’Connell, NBC10 Boston commentator and analyst, agreed that specializing in the proof will probably be key to the prosecution’s case within the second trial, since that is what jurors appeared most concerned about.
“One factor we all know the jurors reviewed — they wished to know extra concerning the SERT search, the gathering of proof on the Alberts’ property,” she stated. “We all know plenty of stuff they did not appear to care about simply because they did not ask for more information or search extra information. So I believe that is a clue, to your level, that every one this different defending of alleged different folks they did not find out about did not appear to attach with them. It was concerning the proof.”
The homicide trial of Karen Learn ends in a mistrial, because the jury couldn’t give you a unanimous verdict. Whereas this particular in opposition to Learn could also be over, her authorized street is way from over. And this morning, there’s new fallout within the aftermath of the choice.
However what if there’s one other mistrial? What number of instances can the case be re-tried?
“As many because it takes until they get a verdict,” stated Michael Coyne, dean of the Massachusetts College of Legislation. The very fact is what we’ve got here’s a mistrial after one. They will attempt her once more. As a sensible matter, they don’t seem to be going to attempt her until the top of time, however they may in actual fact seemingly proceed to attempt her till they attain a verdict in some way.”
One other subject will seemingly entail discovering an neutral jury, given how a lot consideration the case has acquired. However Loftus stated she would not suppose that will probably be a serious concern.
“I believe it is attention-grabbing, as a result of we truly had this similar dialog about choosing a jury in April. Folks had been so positive they could not choose a jury.”
“I believe folks could be stunned,” Loftus added. “For all of us consumed by this, following it on daily basis, it looks as if there isn’t any approach you possibly can discover jurors who do not know something about this. However I believe, in actual fact, I believe you possibly can discover a honest jury. It would take a little bit bit extra time, you might need to undergo 200-300 such as you did the primary time.”
She stated it is also potential that the venue might be moved, or jurors might be taken from one other county. However she would not suppose that can finally be needed.
“I do not suppose it is going to be an issue discovering it,” Loftus stated. “It would simply take a little bit extra work.”
Mere minutes after a mistrial was declared Monday within the controversial Karen Learn homicide case, prosecutors introduced they plan to re-try the case. A listening to is already set for July 22 to begin to decide how that course of will transfer ahead.
However what would possibly a second Karen Learn trial seem like, and the way may it differ from the primary? Our authorized consultants did a deep dive on this throughout Monday’s episode of “Canton Confidential,” even answering some viewer questions on what to anticipate.
“I am not stunned they are going to re-try it,” stated Katherine Loftus, a Boston legal professional with Loftus & Loftus PC. “The commonwealth believes Karen Learn is responsible. And you’ve got the surface secondary subject, actually they have been accused — the workplace itself, legislation enforcement, all people concerned — of this cover-up, so I believe they’ve type of a two-fold objective of the subsequent case.”
However she stated she expects to see a really totally different case the second time round.
“I do suppose they should shorten it,” Loftus stated. “I believe that one of many many issues the commonwealth had was they actually targeted an excessive amount of on the protection concept. I believe they should actually on the entrance finish perhaps name a couple of witnesses, oen or two poliec officers, one or two civilians. It is all of the extras that we do not want. Concentrate on the proof, what the power of their case is.”
She additionally stated she would not be stunned if a particular prosecutor is introduced in to help Assistant District Legal professional Adam Lally.
“You want somebody stylistically, somebody to go toe-to-toe with whoever it’ll be — David Yannetti, who is aware of if Alan Jackson goes to remain on. Clearly, as you stated, it prices some huge cash to re-try a case like this.”
“I believe each side are going to take a while, tweak what they did the primary time round and we’ll see which approach it comes out.”
Sue O’Connell, NBC10 Boston commentator and analyst, agreed that specializing in the proof will probably be key to the prosecution’s case within the second trial, since that is what jurors appeared most concerned about.
“One factor we all know the jurors reviewed — they wished to know extra concerning the SERT search, the gathering of proof on the Alberts’ property,” she stated. “We all know plenty of stuff they did not appear to care about simply because they did not ask for more information or search extra information. So I believe that is a clue, to your level, that every one this different defending of alleged different folks they did not find out about did not appear to attach with them. It was concerning the proof.”
The homicide trial of Karen Learn ends in a mistrial, because the jury couldn’t give you a unanimous verdict. Whereas this particular in opposition to Learn could also be over, her authorized street is way from over. And this morning, there’s new fallout within the aftermath of the choice.
However what if there’s one other mistrial? What number of instances can the case be re-tried?
“As many because it takes until they get a verdict,” stated Michael Coyne, dean of the Massachusetts College of Legislation. The very fact is what we’ve got here’s a mistrial after one. They will attempt her once more. As a sensible matter, they don’t seem to be going to attempt her until the top of time, however they may in actual fact seemingly proceed to attempt her till they attain a verdict in some way.”
One other subject will seemingly entail discovering an neutral jury, given how a lot consideration the case has acquired. However Loftus stated she would not suppose that will probably be a serious concern.
“I believe it is attention-grabbing, as a result of we truly had this similar dialog about choosing a jury in April. Folks had been so positive they could not choose a jury.”
“I believe folks could be stunned,” Loftus added. “For all of us consumed by this, following it on daily basis, it looks as if there isn’t any approach you possibly can discover jurors who do not know something about this. However I believe, in actual fact, I believe you possibly can discover a honest jury. It would take a little bit bit extra time, you might need to undergo 200-300 such as you did the primary time.”
She stated it is also potential that the venue might be moved, or jurors might be taken from one other county. However she would not suppose that can finally be needed.
“I do not suppose it is going to be an issue discovering it,” Loftus stated. “It would simply take a little bit extra work.”
Mere minutes after a mistrial was declared Monday within the controversial Karen Learn homicide case, prosecutors introduced they plan to re-try the case. A listening to is already set for July 22 to begin to decide how that course of will transfer ahead.
However what would possibly a second Karen Learn trial seem like, and the way may it differ from the primary? Our authorized consultants did a deep dive on this throughout Monday’s episode of “Canton Confidential,” even answering some viewer questions on what to anticipate.
“I am not stunned they are going to re-try it,” stated Katherine Loftus, a Boston legal professional with Loftus & Loftus PC. “The commonwealth believes Karen Learn is responsible. And you’ve got the surface secondary subject, actually they have been accused — the workplace itself, legislation enforcement, all people concerned — of this cover-up, so I believe they’ve type of a two-fold objective of the subsequent case.”
However she stated she expects to see a really totally different case the second time round.
“I do suppose they should shorten it,” Loftus stated. “I believe that one of many many issues the commonwealth had was they actually targeted an excessive amount of on the protection concept. I believe they should actually on the entrance finish perhaps name a couple of witnesses, oen or two poliec officers, one or two civilians. It is all of the extras that we do not want. Concentrate on the proof, what the power of their case is.”
She additionally stated she would not be stunned if a particular prosecutor is introduced in to help Assistant District Legal professional Adam Lally.
“You want somebody stylistically, somebody to go toe-to-toe with whoever it’ll be — David Yannetti, who is aware of if Alan Jackson goes to remain on. Clearly, as you stated, it prices some huge cash to re-try a case like this.”
“I believe each side are going to take a while, tweak what they did the primary time round and we’ll see which approach it comes out.”
Sue O’Connell, NBC10 Boston commentator and analyst, agreed that specializing in the proof will probably be key to the prosecution’s case within the second trial, since that is what jurors appeared most concerned about.
“One factor we all know the jurors reviewed — they wished to know extra concerning the SERT search, the gathering of proof on the Alberts’ property,” she stated. “We all know plenty of stuff they did not appear to care about simply because they did not ask for more information or search extra information. So I believe that is a clue, to your level, that every one this different defending of alleged different folks they did not find out about did not appear to attach with them. It was concerning the proof.”
The homicide trial of Karen Learn ends in a mistrial, because the jury couldn’t give you a unanimous verdict. Whereas this particular in opposition to Learn could also be over, her authorized street is way from over. And this morning, there’s new fallout within the aftermath of the choice.
However what if there’s one other mistrial? What number of instances can the case be re-tried?
“As many because it takes until they get a verdict,” stated Michael Coyne, dean of the Massachusetts College of Legislation. The very fact is what we’ve got here’s a mistrial after one. They will attempt her once more. As a sensible matter, they don’t seem to be going to attempt her until the top of time, however they may in actual fact seemingly proceed to attempt her till they attain a verdict in some way.”
One other subject will seemingly entail discovering an neutral jury, given how a lot consideration the case has acquired. However Loftus stated she would not suppose that will probably be a serious concern.
“I believe it is attention-grabbing, as a result of we truly had this similar dialog about choosing a jury in April. Folks had been so positive they could not choose a jury.”
“I believe folks could be stunned,” Loftus added. “For all of us consumed by this, following it on daily basis, it looks as if there isn’t any approach you possibly can discover jurors who do not know something about this. However I believe, in actual fact, I believe you possibly can discover a honest jury. It would take a little bit bit extra time, you might need to undergo 200-300 such as you did the primary time.”
She stated it is also potential that the venue might be moved, or jurors might be taken from one other county. However she would not suppose that can finally be needed.
“I do not suppose it is going to be an issue discovering it,” Loftus stated. “It would simply take a little bit extra work.”
Mere minutes after a mistrial was declared Monday within the controversial Karen Learn homicide case, prosecutors introduced they plan to re-try the case. A listening to is already set for July 22 to begin to decide how that course of will transfer ahead.
However what would possibly a second Karen Learn trial seem like, and the way may it differ from the primary? Our authorized consultants did a deep dive on this throughout Monday’s episode of “Canton Confidential,” even answering some viewer questions on what to anticipate.
“I am not stunned they are going to re-try it,” stated Katherine Loftus, a Boston legal professional with Loftus & Loftus PC. “The commonwealth believes Karen Learn is responsible. And you’ve got the surface secondary subject, actually they have been accused — the workplace itself, legislation enforcement, all people concerned — of this cover-up, so I believe they’ve type of a two-fold objective of the subsequent case.”
However she stated she expects to see a really totally different case the second time round.
“I do suppose they should shorten it,” Loftus stated. “I believe that one of many many issues the commonwealth had was they actually targeted an excessive amount of on the protection concept. I believe they should actually on the entrance finish perhaps name a couple of witnesses, oen or two poliec officers, one or two civilians. It is all of the extras that we do not want. Concentrate on the proof, what the power of their case is.”
She additionally stated she would not be stunned if a particular prosecutor is introduced in to help Assistant District Legal professional Adam Lally.
“You want somebody stylistically, somebody to go toe-to-toe with whoever it’ll be — David Yannetti, who is aware of if Alan Jackson goes to remain on. Clearly, as you stated, it prices some huge cash to re-try a case like this.”
“I believe each side are going to take a while, tweak what they did the primary time round and we’ll see which approach it comes out.”
Sue O’Connell, NBC10 Boston commentator and analyst, agreed that specializing in the proof will probably be key to the prosecution’s case within the second trial, since that is what jurors appeared most concerned about.
“One factor we all know the jurors reviewed — they wished to know extra concerning the SERT search, the gathering of proof on the Alberts’ property,” she stated. “We all know plenty of stuff they did not appear to care about simply because they did not ask for more information or search extra information. So I believe that is a clue, to your level, that every one this different defending of alleged different folks they did not find out about did not appear to attach with them. It was concerning the proof.”
The homicide trial of Karen Learn ends in a mistrial, because the jury couldn’t give you a unanimous verdict. Whereas this particular in opposition to Learn could also be over, her authorized street is way from over. And this morning, there’s new fallout within the aftermath of the choice.
However what if there’s one other mistrial? What number of instances can the case be re-tried?
“As many because it takes until they get a verdict,” stated Michael Coyne, dean of the Massachusetts College of Legislation. The very fact is what we’ve got here’s a mistrial after one. They will attempt her once more. As a sensible matter, they don’t seem to be going to attempt her until the top of time, however they may in actual fact seemingly proceed to attempt her till they attain a verdict in some way.”
One other subject will seemingly entail discovering an neutral jury, given how a lot consideration the case has acquired. However Loftus stated she would not suppose that will probably be a serious concern.
“I believe it is attention-grabbing, as a result of we truly had this similar dialog about choosing a jury in April. Folks had been so positive they could not choose a jury.”
“I believe folks could be stunned,” Loftus added. “For all of us consumed by this, following it on daily basis, it looks as if there isn’t any approach you possibly can discover jurors who do not know something about this. However I believe, in actual fact, I believe you possibly can discover a honest jury. It would take a little bit bit extra time, you might need to undergo 200-300 such as you did the primary time.”
She stated it is also potential that the venue might be moved, or jurors might be taken from one other county. However she would not suppose that can finally be needed.
“I do not suppose it is going to be an issue discovering it,” Loftus stated. “It would simply take a little bit extra work.”
Mere minutes after a mistrial was declared Monday within the controversial Karen Learn homicide case, prosecutors introduced they plan to re-try the case. A listening to is already set for July 22 to begin to decide how that course of will transfer ahead.
However what would possibly a second Karen Learn trial seem like, and the way may it differ from the primary? Our authorized consultants did a deep dive on this throughout Monday’s episode of “Canton Confidential,” even answering some viewer questions on what to anticipate.
“I am not stunned they are going to re-try it,” stated Katherine Loftus, a Boston legal professional with Loftus & Loftus PC. “The commonwealth believes Karen Learn is responsible. And you’ve got the surface secondary subject, actually they have been accused — the workplace itself, legislation enforcement, all people concerned — of this cover-up, so I believe they’ve type of a two-fold objective of the subsequent case.”
However she stated she expects to see a really totally different case the second time round.
“I do suppose they should shorten it,” Loftus stated. “I believe that one of many many issues the commonwealth had was they actually targeted an excessive amount of on the protection concept. I believe they should actually on the entrance finish perhaps name a couple of witnesses, oen or two poliec officers, one or two civilians. It is all of the extras that we do not want. Concentrate on the proof, what the power of their case is.”
She additionally stated she would not be stunned if a particular prosecutor is introduced in to help Assistant District Legal professional Adam Lally.
“You want somebody stylistically, somebody to go toe-to-toe with whoever it’ll be — David Yannetti, who is aware of if Alan Jackson goes to remain on. Clearly, as you stated, it prices some huge cash to re-try a case like this.”
“I believe each side are going to take a while, tweak what they did the primary time round and we’ll see which approach it comes out.”
Sue O’Connell, NBC10 Boston commentator and analyst, agreed that specializing in the proof will probably be key to the prosecution’s case within the second trial, since that is what jurors appeared most concerned about.
“One factor we all know the jurors reviewed — they wished to know extra concerning the SERT search, the gathering of proof on the Alberts’ property,” she stated. “We all know plenty of stuff they did not appear to care about simply because they did not ask for more information or search extra information. So I believe that is a clue, to your level, that every one this different defending of alleged different folks they did not find out about did not appear to attach with them. It was concerning the proof.”
The homicide trial of Karen Learn ends in a mistrial, because the jury couldn’t give you a unanimous verdict. Whereas this particular in opposition to Learn could also be over, her authorized street is way from over. And this morning, there’s new fallout within the aftermath of the choice.
However what if there’s one other mistrial? What number of instances can the case be re-tried?
“As many because it takes until they get a verdict,” stated Michael Coyne, dean of the Massachusetts College of Legislation. The very fact is what we’ve got here’s a mistrial after one. They will attempt her once more. As a sensible matter, they don’t seem to be going to attempt her until the top of time, however they may in actual fact seemingly proceed to attempt her till they attain a verdict in some way.”
One other subject will seemingly entail discovering an neutral jury, given how a lot consideration the case has acquired. However Loftus stated she would not suppose that will probably be a serious concern.
“I believe it is attention-grabbing, as a result of we truly had this similar dialog about choosing a jury in April. Folks had been so positive they could not choose a jury.”
“I believe folks could be stunned,” Loftus added. “For all of us consumed by this, following it on daily basis, it looks as if there isn’t any approach you possibly can discover jurors who do not know something about this. However I believe, in actual fact, I believe you possibly can discover a honest jury. It would take a little bit bit extra time, you might need to undergo 200-300 such as you did the primary time.”
She stated it is also potential that the venue might be moved, or jurors might be taken from one other county. However she would not suppose that can finally be needed.
“I do not suppose it is going to be an issue discovering it,” Loftus stated. “It would simply take a little bit extra work.”