CNN
—
The most important query now that the Supreme Court docket has determined Donald Trump is entitled to some immunity from prosecution: What occurs subsequent in particular counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case towards the previous president?
Assuming Smith stays the course, written arguments and even proceedings with witness testimony and proof are more likely to be subsequent earlier than US District Choose Tanya Chutkan in Washington, DC.
The particular counsel’s workplace has not responded but publicly to the choice, and there’s nothing in the meanwhile on Chutkan’s docket indicating what subsequent steps will probably be taken within the trial court docket.
These are more likely to come within the days after the Supreme Court docket palms the opinion down formally to the federal courts in DC. The mechanism for sending a case again down normally takes as an extended as a month, however the excessive court docket might act extra rapidly – notably if a celebration asks it to.
As soon as Chutkan works via the authorized points, it’s potential that extra appeals might put the case on maintain once more. Because of this it could be unlikely for Trump to go to trial this yr, if in any respect. However courts could be arduous to foretell.
What Trump is and isn’t immune for
The Supreme Court docket put one set of allegations towards Trump – concerning his and his allies’ efforts to weaponize the Justice Division – within the bucket of absolute immunity.
For the a number of different classes of allegations, Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion mentioned that the decrease courts should undergo a technique of “fact-specific” and maybe “difficult” evaluation.
The Supreme Court docket mentioned that that Trump’s stress marketing campaign on Vice President Mike Pence to assist him overturn the election is “presumptively” immune, and put the burden on the prosecutors to rebut the presumptive immunity.
As for Trump’s state-level efforts to overturn the outcomes, together with the faux electors scheme, the excessive court docket advised decrease courts to investigate what of that conduct was an official act and what was not.
Roberts mentioned that evaluation would require an “evaluation of quite a few alleged interactions with all kinds of state officers and personal individuals.”
Sotomayor points stark warning about presidential immunity ruling
The decrease courts may also must parse what conduct was an official presidential act with regards to Trump’s January 6-related habits and his feedback that egged on the Capitol riot. Roberts mentioned the decrease courts might must look “what else was mentioned contemporaneous to the excerpted communications, or who was concerned in transmitting the digital communications and in organizing the rally” in deciding which of these communications are immunized.
If Chutkan does rule on on what’s an official act and what’s not, it’s potential that Trump would enchantment these rulings to the DC Circuit court docket and finally to the Supreme Court docket.
The Supreme Court docket’s ruling strongly means that these appeals would have to be resolved pre-trial, making it unlikely this case goes to a jury earlier than People forged their ballots for president.
It’s additionally potential that Smith’s workplace winnows down his case to convey it according to the Supreme Court docket’s opinion. That might imply slicing out some components of what they wish to current to the jury, and even refiling the indictment towards Trump so it doesn’t allege violations associated to the official work of the presidency.
The particular counsel’s workplace may also must grapple with the Supreme Court docket’s determination to chop out any proof from that case that may be official actions of the President – throwing one other wrench in how the case will probably be prosecuted.
Nonetheless, with Chutkan, the timeline might transfer rapidly – doubtlessly as rapidly as a number of weeks for briefing and hearings.
CNN
—
The most important query now that the Supreme Court docket has determined Donald Trump is entitled to some immunity from prosecution: What occurs subsequent in particular counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case towards the previous president?
Assuming Smith stays the course, written arguments and even proceedings with witness testimony and proof are more likely to be subsequent earlier than US District Choose Tanya Chutkan in Washington, DC.
The particular counsel’s workplace has not responded but publicly to the choice, and there’s nothing in the meanwhile on Chutkan’s docket indicating what subsequent steps will probably be taken within the trial court docket.
These are more likely to come within the days after the Supreme Court docket palms the opinion down formally to the federal courts in DC. The mechanism for sending a case again down normally takes as an extended as a month, however the excessive court docket might act extra rapidly – notably if a celebration asks it to.
As soon as Chutkan works via the authorized points, it’s potential that extra appeals might put the case on maintain once more. Because of this it could be unlikely for Trump to go to trial this yr, if in any respect. However courts could be arduous to foretell.
What Trump is and isn’t immune for
The Supreme Court docket put one set of allegations towards Trump – concerning his and his allies’ efforts to weaponize the Justice Division – within the bucket of absolute immunity.
For the a number of different classes of allegations, Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion mentioned that the decrease courts should undergo a technique of “fact-specific” and maybe “difficult” evaluation.
The Supreme Court docket mentioned that that Trump’s stress marketing campaign on Vice President Mike Pence to assist him overturn the election is “presumptively” immune, and put the burden on the prosecutors to rebut the presumptive immunity.
As for Trump’s state-level efforts to overturn the outcomes, together with the faux electors scheme, the excessive court docket advised decrease courts to investigate what of that conduct was an official act and what was not.
Roberts mentioned that evaluation would require an “evaluation of quite a few alleged interactions with all kinds of state officers and personal individuals.”
Sotomayor points stark warning about presidential immunity ruling
The decrease courts may also must parse what conduct was an official presidential act with regards to Trump’s January 6-related habits and his feedback that egged on the Capitol riot. Roberts mentioned the decrease courts might must look “what else was mentioned contemporaneous to the excerpted communications, or who was concerned in transmitting the digital communications and in organizing the rally” in deciding which of these communications are immunized.
If Chutkan does rule on on what’s an official act and what’s not, it’s potential that Trump would enchantment these rulings to the DC Circuit court docket and finally to the Supreme Court docket.
The Supreme Court docket’s ruling strongly means that these appeals would have to be resolved pre-trial, making it unlikely this case goes to a jury earlier than People forged their ballots for president.
It’s additionally potential that Smith’s workplace winnows down his case to convey it according to the Supreme Court docket’s opinion. That might imply slicing out some components of what they wish to current to the jury, and even refiling the indictment towards Trump so it doesn’t allege violations associated to the official work of the presidency.
The particular counsel’s workplace may also must grapple with the Supreme Court docket’s determination to chop out any proof from that case that may be official actions of the President – throwing one other wrench in how the case will probably be prosecuted.
Nonetheless, with Chutkan, the timeline might transfer rapidly – doubtlessly as rapidly as a number of weeks for briefing and hearings.
CNN
—
The most important query now that the Supreme Court docket has determined Donald Trump is entitled to some immunity from prosecution: What occurs subsequent in particular counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case towards the previous president?
Assuming Smith stays the course, written arguments and even proceedings with witness testimony and proof are more likely to be subsequent earlier than US District Choose Tanya Chutkan in Washington, DC.
The particular counsel’s workplace has not responded but publicly to the choice, and there’s nothing in the meanwhile on Chutkan’s docket indicating what subsequent steps will probably be taken within the trial court docket.
These are more likely to come within the days after the Supreme Court docket palms the opinion down formally to the federal courts in DC. The mechanism for sending a case again down normally takes as an extended as a month, however the excessive court docket might act extra rapidly – notably if a celebration asks it to.
As soon as Chutkan works via the authorized points, it’s potential that extra appeals might put the case on maintain once more. Because of this it could be unlikely for Trump to go to trial this yr, if in any respect. However courts could be arduous to foretell.
What Trump is and isn’t immune for
The Supreme Court docket put one set of allegations towards Trump – concerning his and his allies’ efforts to weaponize the Justice Division – within the bucket of absolute immunity.
For the a number of different classes of allegations, Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion mentioned that the decrease courts should undergo a technique of “fact-specific” and maybe “difficult” evaluation.
The Supreme Court docket mentioned that that Trump’s stress marketing campaign on Vice President Mike Pence to assist him overturn the election is “presumptively” immune, and put the burden on the prosecutors to rebut the presumptive immunity.
As for Trump’s state-level efforts to overturn the outcomes, together with the faux electors scheme, the excessive court docket advised decrease courts to investigate what of that conduct was an official act and what was not.
Roberts mentioned that evaluation would require an “evaluation of quite a few alleged interactions with all kinds of state officers and personal individuals.”
Sotomayor points stark warning about presidential immunity ruling
The decrease courts may also must parse what conduct was an official presidential act with regards to Trump’s January 6-related habits and his feedback that egged on the Capitol riot. Roberts mentioned the decrease courts might must look “what else was mentioned contemporaneous to the excerpted communications, or who was concerned in transmitting the digital communications and in organizing the rally” in deciding which of these communications are immunized.
If Chutkan does rule on on what’s an official act and what’s not, it’s potential that Trump would enchantment these rulings to the DC Circuit court docket and finally to the Supreme Court docket.
The Supreme Court docket’s ruling strongly means that these appeals would have to be resolved pre-trial, making it unlikely this case goes to a jury earlier than People forged their ballots for president.
It’s additionally potential that Smith’s workplace winnows down his case to convey it according to the Supreme Court docket’s opinion. That might imply slicing out some components of what they wish to current to the jury, and even refiling the indictment towards Trump so it doesn’t allege violations associated to the official work of the presidency.
The particular counsel’s workplace may also must grapple with the Supreme Court docket’s determination to chop out any proof from that case that may be official actions of the President – throwing one other wrench in how the case will probably be prosecuted.
Nonetheless, with Chutkan, the timeline might transfer rapidly – doubtlessly as rapidly as a number of weeks for briefing and hearings.
CNN
—
The most important query now that the Supreme Court docket has determined Donald Trump is entitled to some immunity from prosecution: What occurs subsequent in particular counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case towards the previous president?
Assuming Smith stays the course, written arguments and even proceedings with witness testimony and proof are more likely to be subsequent earlier than US District Choose Tanya Chutkan in Washington, DC.
The particular counsel’s workplace has not responded but publicly to the choice, and there’s nothing in the meanwhile on Chutkan’s docket indicating what subsequent steps will probably be taken within the trial court docket.
These are more likely to come within the days after the Supreme Court docket palms the opinion down formally to the federal courts in DC. The mechanism for sending a case again down normally takes as an extended as a month, however the excessive court docket might act extra rapidly – notably if a celebration asks it to.
As soon as Chutkan works via the authorized points, it’s potential that extra appeals might put the case on maintain once more. Because of this it could be unlikely for Trump to go to trial this yr, if in any respect. However courts could be arduous to foretell.
What Trump is and isn’t immune for
The Supreme Court docket put one set of allegations towards Trump – concerning his and his allies’ efforts to weaponize the Justice Division – within the bucket of absolute immunity.
For the a number of different classes of allegations, Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion mentioned that the decrease courts should undergo a technique of “fact-specific” and maybe “difficult” evaluation.
The Supreme Court docket mentioned that that Trump’s stress marketing campaign on Vice President Mike Pence to assist him overturn the election is “presumptively” immune, and put the burden on the prosecutors to rebut the presumptive immunity.
As for Trump’s state-level efforts to overturn the outcomes, together with the faux electors scheme, the excessive court docket advised decrease courts to investigate what of that conduct was an official act and what was not.
Roberts mentioned that evaluation would require an “evaluation of quite a few alleged interactions with all kinds of state officers and personal individuals.”
Sotomayor points stark warning about presidential immunity ruling
The decrease courts may also must parse what conduct was an official presidential act with regards to Trump’s January 6-related habits and his feedback that egged on the Capitol riot. Roberts mentioned the decrease courts might must look “what else was mentioned contemporaneous to the excerpted communications, or who was concerned in transmitting the digital communications and in organizing the rally” in deciding which of these communications are immunized.
If Chutkan does rule on on what’s an official act and what’s not, it’s potential that Trump would enchantment these rulings to the DC Circuit court docket and finally to the Supreme Court docket.
The Supreme Court docket’s ruling strongly means that these appeals would have to be resolved pre-trial, making it unlikely this case goes to a jury earlier than People forged their ballots for president.
It’s additionally potential that Smith’s workplace winnows down his case to convey it according to the Supreme Court docket’s opinion. That might imply slicing out some components of what they wish to current to the jury, and even refiling the indictment towards Trump so it doesn’t allege violations associated to the official work of the presidency.
The particular counsel’s workplace may also must grapple with the Supreme Court docket’s determination to chop out any proof from that case that may be official actions of the President – throwing one other wrench in how the case will probably be prosecuted.
Nonetheless, with Chutkan, the timeline might transfer rapidly – doubtlessly as rapidly as a number of weeks for briefing and hearings.
CNN
—
The most important query now that the Supreme Court docket has determined Donald Trump is entitled to some immunity from prosecution: What occurs subsequent in particular counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case towards the previous president?
Assuming Smith stays the course, written arguments and even proceedings with witness testimony and proof are more likely to be subsequent earlier than US District Choose Tanya Chutkan in Washington, DC.
The particular counsel’s workplace has not responded but publicly to the choice, and there’s nothing in the meanwhile on Chutkan’s docket indicating what subsequent steps will probably be taken within the trial court docket.
These are more likely to come within the days after the Supreme Court docket palms the opinion down formally to the federal courts in DC. The mechanism for sending a case again down normally takes as an extended as a month, however the excessive court docket might act extra rapidly – notably if a celebration asks it to.
As soon as Chutkan works via the authorized points, it’s potential that extra appeals might put the case on maintain once more. Because of this it could be unlikely for Trump to go to trial this yr, if in any respect. However courts could be arduous to foretell.
What Trump is and isn’t immune for
The Supreme Court docket put one set of allegations towards Trump – concerning his and his allies’ efforts to weaponize the Justice Division – within the bucket of absolute immunity.
For the a number of different classes of allegations, Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion mentioned that the decrease courts should undergo a technique of “fact-specific” and maybe “difficult” evaluation.
The Supreme Court docket mentioned that that Trump’s stress marketing campaign on Vice President Mike Pence to assist him overturn the election is “presumptively” immune, and put the burden on the prosecutors to rebut the presumptive immunity.
As for Trump’s state-level efforts to overturn the outcomes, together with the faux electors scheme, the excessive court docket advised decrease courts to investigate what of that conduct was an official act and what was not.
Roberts mentioned that evaluation would require an “evaluation of quite a few alleged interactions with all kinds of state officers and personal individuals.”
Sotomayor points stark warning about presidential immunity ruling
The decrease courts may also must parse what conduct was an official presidential act with regards to Trump’s January 6-related habits and his feedback that egged on the Capitol riot. Roberts mentioned the decrease courts might must look “what else was mentioned contemporaneous to the excerpted communications, or who was concerned in transmitting the digital communications and in organizing the rally” in deciding which of these communications are immunized.
If Chutkan does rule on on what’s an official act and what’s not, it’s potential that Trump would enchantment these rulings to the DC Circuit court docket and finally to the Supreme Court docket.
The Supreme Court docket’s ruling strongly means that these appeals would have to be resolved pre-trial, making it unlikely this case goes to a jury earlier than People forged their ballots for president.
It’s additionally potential that Smith’s workplace winnows down his case to convey it according to the Supreme Court docket’s opinion. That might imply slicing out some components of what they wish to current to the jury, and even refiling the indictment towards Trump so it doesn’t allege violations associated to the official work of the presidency.
The particular counsel’s workplace may also must grapple with the Supreme Court docket’s determination to chop out any proof from that case that may be official actions of the President – throwing one other wrench in how the case will probably be prosecuted.
Nonetheless, with Chutkan, the timeline might transfer rapidly – doubtlessly as rapidly as a number of weeks for briefing and hearings.
CNN
—
The most important query now that the Supreme Court docket has determined Donald Trump is entitled to some immunity from prosecution: What occurs subsequent in particular counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case towards the previous president?
Assuming Smith stays the course, written arguments and even proceedings with witness testimony and proof are more likely to be subsequent earlier than US District Choose Tanya Chutkan in Washington, DC.
The particular counsel’s workplace has not responded but publicly to the choice, and there’s nothing in the meanwhile on Chutkan’s docket indicating what subsequent steps will probably be taken within the trial court docket.
These are more likely to come within the days after the Supreme Court docket palms the opinion down formally to the federal courts in DC. The mechanism for sending a case again down normally takes as an extended as a month, however the excessive court docket might act extra rapidly – notably if a celebration asks it to.
As soon as Chutkan works via the authorized points, it’s potential that extra appeals might put the case on maintain once more. Because of this it could be unlikely for Trump to go to trial this yr, if in any respect. However courts could be arduous to foretell.
What Trump is and isn’t immune for
The Supreme Court docket put one set of allegations towards Trump – concerning his and his allies’ efforts to weaponize the Justice Division – within the bucket of absolute immunity.
For the a number of different classes of allegations, Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion mentioned that the decrease courts should undergo a technique of “fact-specific” and maybe “difficult” evaluation.
The Supreme Court docket mentioned that that Trump’s stress marketing campaign on Vice President Mike Pence to assist him overturn the election is “presumptively” immune, and put the burden on the prosecutors to rebut the presumptive immunity.
As for Trump’s state-level efforts to overturn the outcomes, together with the faux electors scheme, the excessive court docket advised decrease courts to investigate what of that conduct was an official act and what was not.
Roberts mentioned that evaluation would require an “evaluation of quite a few alleged interactions with all kinds of state officers and personal individuals.”
Sotomayor points stark warning about presidential immunity ruling
The decrease courts may also must parse what conduct was an official presidential act with regards to Trump’s January 6-related habits and his feedback that egged on the Capitol riot. Roberts mentioned the decrease courts might must look “what else was mentioned contemporaneous to the excerpted communications, or who was concerned in transmitting the digital communications and in organizing the rally” in deciding which of these communications are immunized.
If Chutkan does rule on on what’s an official act and what’s not, it’s potential that Trump would enchantment these rulings to the DC Circuit court docket and finally to the Supreme Court docket.
The Supreme Court docket’s ruling strongly means that these appeals would have to be resolved pre-trial, making it unlikely this case goes to a jury earlier than People forged their ballots for president.
It’s additionally potential that Smith’s workplace winnows down his case to convey it according to the Supreme Court docket’s opinion. That might imply slicing out some components of what they wish to current to the jury, and even refiling the indictment towards Trump so it doesn’t allege violations associated to the official work of the presidency.
The particular counsel’s workplace may also must grapple with the Supreme Court docket’s determination to chop out any proof from that case that may be official actions of the President – throwing one other wrench in how the case will probably be prosecuted.
Nonetheless, with Chutkan, the timeline might transfer rapidly – doubtlessly as rapidly as a number of weeks for briefing and hearings.
CNN
—
The most important query now that the Supreme Court docket has determined Donald Trump is entitled to some immunity from prosecution: What occurs subsequent in particular counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case towards the previous president?
Assuming Smith stays the course, written arguments and even proceedings with witness testimony and proof are more likely to be subsequent earlier than US District Choose Tanya Chutkan in Washington, DC.
The particular counsel’s workplace has not responded but publicly to the choice, and there’s nothing in the meanwhile on Chutkan’s docket indicating what subsequent steps will probably be taken within the trial court docket.
These are more likely to come within the days after the Supreme Court docket palms the opinion down formally to the federal courts in DC. The mechanism for sending a case again down normally takes as an extended as a month, however the excessive court docket might act extra rapidly – notably if a celebration asks it to.
As soon as Chutkan works via the authorized points, it’s potential that extra appeals might put the case on maintain once more. Because of this it could be unlikely for Trump to go to trial this yr, if in any respect. However courts could be arduous to foretell.
What Trump is and isn’t immune for
The Supreme Court docket put one set of allegations towards Trump – concerning his and his allies’ efforts to weaponize the Justice Division – within the bucket of absolute immunity.
For the a number of different classes of allegations, Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion mentioned that the decrease courts should undergo a technique of “fact-specific” and maybe “difficult” evaluation.
The Supreme Court docket mentioned that that Trump’s stress marketing campaign on Vice President Mike Pence to assist him overturn the election is “presumptively” immune, and put the burden on the prosecutors to rebut the presumptive immunity.
As for Trump’s state-level efforts to overturn the outcomes, together with the faux electors scheme, the excessive court docket advised decrease courts to investigate what of that conduct was an official act and what was not.
Roberts mentioned that evaluation would require an “evaluation of quite a few alleged interactions with all kinds of state officers and personal individuals.”
Sotomayor points stark warning about presidential immunity ruling
The decrease courts may also must parse what conduct was an official presidential act with regards to Trump’s January 6-related habits and his feedback that egged on the Capitol riot. Roberts mentioned the decrease courts might must look “what else was mentioned contemporaneous to the excerpted communications, or who was concerned in transmitting the digital communications and in organizing the rally” in deciding which of these communications are immunized.
If Chutkan does rule on on what’s an official act and what’s not, it’s potential that Trump would enchantment these rulings to the DC Circuit court docket and finally to the Supreme Court docket.
The Supreme Court docket’s ruling strongly means that these appeals would have to be resolved pre-trial, making it unlikely this case goes to a jury earlier than People forged their ballots for president.
It’s additionally potential that Smith’s workplace winnows down his case to convey it according to the Supreme Court docket’s opinion. That might imply slicing out some components of what they wish to current to the jury, and even refiling the indictment towards Trump so it doesn’t allege violations associated to the official work of the presidency.
The particular counsel’s workplace may also must grapple with the Supreme Court docket’s determination to chop out any proof from that case that may be official actions of the President – throwing one other wrench in how the case will probably be prosecuted.
Nonetheless, with Chutkan, the timeline might transfer rapidly – doubtlessly as rapidly as a number of weeks for briefing and hearings.
CNN
—
The most important query now that the Supreme Court docket has determined Donald Trump is entitled to some immunity from prosecution: What occurs subsequent in particular counsel Jack Smith’s election interference case towards the previous president?
Assuming Smith stays the course, written arguments and even proceedings with witness testimony and proof are more likely to be subsequent earlier than US District Choose Tanya Chutkan in Washington, DC.
The particular counsel’s workplace has not responded but publicly to the choice, and there’s nothing in the meanwhile on Chutkan’s docket indicating what subsequent steps will probably be taken within the trial court docket.
These are more likely to come within the days after the Supreme Court docket palms the opinion down formally to the federal courts in DC. The mechanism for sending a case again down normally takes as an extended as a month, however the excessive court docket might act extra rapidly – notably if a celebration asks it to.
As soon as Chutkan works via the authorized points, it’s potential that extra appeals might put the case on maintain once more. Because of this it could be unlikely for Trump to go to trial this yr, if in any respect. However courts could be arduous to foretell.
What Trump is and isn’t immune for
The Supreme Court docket put one set of allegations towards Trump – concerning his and his allies’ efforts to weaponize the Justice Division – within the bucket of absolute immunity.
For the a number of different classes of allegations, Chief Justice John Roberts’ majority opinion mentioned that the decrease courts should undergo a technique of “fact-specific” and maybe “difficult” evaluation.
The Supreme Court docket mentioned that that Trump’s stress marketing campaign on Vice President Mike Pence to assist him overturn the election is “presumptively” immune, and put the burden on the prosecutors to rebut the presumptive immunity.
As for Trump’s state-level efforts to overturn the outcomes, together with the faux electors scheme, the excessive court docket advised decrease courts to investigate what of that conduct was an official act and what was not.
Roberts mentioned that evaluation would require an “evaluation of quite a few alleged interactions with all kinds of state officers and personal individuals.”
Sotomayor points stark warning about presidential immunity ruling
The decrease courts may also must parse what conduct was an official presidential act with regards to Trump’s January 6-related habits and his feedback that egged on the Capitol riot. Roberts mentioned the decrease courts might must look “what else was mentioned contemporaneous to the excerpted communications, or who was concerned in transmitting the digital communications and in organizing the rally” in deciding which of these communications are immunized.
If Chutkan does rule on on what’s an official act and what’s not, it’s potential that Trump would enchantment these rulings to the DC Circuit court docket and finally to the Supreme Court docket.
The Supreme Court docket’s ruling strongly means that these appeals would have to be resolved pre-trial, making it unlikely this case goes to a jury earlier than People forged their ballots for president.
It’s additionally potential that Smith’s workplace winnows down his case to convey it according to the Supreme Court docket’s opinion. That might imply slicing out some components of what they wish to current to the jury, and even refiling the indictment towards Trump so it doesn’t allege violations associated to the official work of the presidency.
The particular counsel’s workplace may also must grapple with the Supreme Court docket’s determination to chop out any proof from that case that may be official actions of the President – throwing one other wrench in how the case will probably be prosecuted.
Nonetheless, with Chutkan, the timeline might transfer rapidly – doubtlessly as rapidly as a number of weeks for briefing and hearings.